Optimizing IGP link costs for improving IP-level resilience with Loop-Free Alternates
نویسندگان
چکیده
The IP Fast ReRoute–Loop-Free Alternates (LFA) standard is a simple and easily deployable technique to provide fast failure protection right in the IP layer. To our days, most major IP device vendors have products on the market that support LFA out of the box. Unfortunately, LFA usually cannot protect all possible failure scenarios in a general network topology. Therefore, it is crucial to develop LFA-based network optimization tools in order to assist operators in deciding whether deploying LFA in their network will supply sufficient resiliency. In this paper, we give a new graph theoretical framework for analyzing LFA failure case coverage, and then we investigate how to optimize the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) link costs in order to maximize the number of protected failure scenarios. We show that this problem is NP-complete even in a very restricted formulation, and we give an exact algorithm as well as a complete family of heuristics to solve it. Our simulation studies indicate that a deliberate tuning of the approximation strategy can significantly improve the quality of the IGP link costs, and we conclude that LFA cost optimization has the potential for boosting LFAbased resilience in most operational networks significantly.
منابع مشابه
The Effect of Combining Loop-Free Alternates and Not-Via Addresses in IP Fast Reroute
The IETF currently discusses fast reroute mechanisms for IP networks (IP FRR) to accelerate the recovery in case of network element failures and to avoid microloops during network-wide routing re-convergence. Several mechanisms are proposed. Loop-free alternates (LFAs) are simple, but they cannot cover all single link and node failures. Not-via addresses are more complex and cover all single fa...
متن کاملLoop-free alternates and not-via addresses: A proper combination for IP fast reroute?
The IETF currently discusses fast reroute mechanisms for IP networks (IP FRR). IP FRR accelerates the recovery in case of network element failures and avoids micro-loops during re-convergence. Several mechanisms are proposed. Loop-free alternates (LFAs) are simple but cannot cover all single link and node failures. Not-via addresses can protect against these failures but are more complex, in pa...
متن کاملOn providing fast protection with remote loop-free alternates - Analyzing and Optimizing Unit Cost Networks
Up to not so long ago, Loop-Free Alternates (LFA) was the only viable option for providing fast protection in pure IP and MPLS/LDP networks. Unfortunately, LFA cannot provide protection for all possible failure cases in general. Recently, the IETF has initiated the Remote Loop-Free Alternates (rLFA) technique as a simple extension to LFA, to boost the fraction of failure cases covered by fast p...
متن کاملBasic Specification for IP Fast Reroute: Loop-Free Alternates
Status of This Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract This document describes the use ...
متن کاملAn Offline Hybrid IGP/MPLS Traffic Engineering Approach under LSP Constraints
MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) enhances the possibility to engineer the traffic on IP networks by allowing explicit routes. Though IGP (Interior Gateway Protocol) routing has proven its scalability and reliability, effective traffic engineering (TE) has been difficult to achieve in public IP networks, because of the limited functional capabilities of conventional IP technologies. Without...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Computer Communications
دوره 36 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013